new

aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs willo.

willo is a clean, simple one-way video tool aimed at small teams and fast setup. aperture offers a similarly fast setup and adds adaptive conversational interviews plus λ-core scoring so you get signal, not just videos. willo is a recording tool. aperture is a decision tool.

try aperture free talk to us

pick willo if

you have a small team, low volume, and want the simplest possible async video tool.
you're fine reviewing every video manually.

pick aperture if

you want scoring and ranking, not a pile of videos to review.
you want adaptive conversations, not scripted prompts.
you want an ats included so you don't need a second tool.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to willo.

feature

aperture

willo

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on willo.

common questions.

is aperture more than willo?+

yes. willo records videos. aperture runs adaptive interviews, scores candidates with confidence intervals, and manages the pipeline end to end.

what's the cost difference?+

aperture pricing is plan-based with a free tier. willo is also accessibly priced. the real difference is what you get for the money: recordings vs scored shortlists.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

ai interviewer

aperture vs heymilo

voice-first ai screening for high-volume hiring.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs chakra

structured voice interviews for technical screens.

compare

interview intelligence

aperture vs brighthire

records the interviews your team already runs.

compare

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs hirevue

the legacy incumbent in async video.

compare

get started today

hire for what actually matters.

stop filtering on keywords. start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs willo.

try aperture free talk to us

pick willo if

you have a small team, low volume, and want the simplest possible async video tool.
you're fine reviewing every video manually.

pick aperture if

you want scoring and ranking, not a pile of videos to review.
you want adaptive conversations, not scripted prompts.
you want an ats included so you don't need a second tool.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to willo.

feature

aperture

willo

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on willo.

common questions.

is aperture more than willo?+

yes. willo records videos. aperture runs adaptive interviews, scores candidates with confidence intervals, and manages the pipeline end to end.

what's the cost difference?+

aperture pricing is plan-based with a free tier. willo is also accessibly priced. the real difference is what you get for the money: recordings vs scored shortlists.

also compare