new

aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs hirevue.

hirevue defined one-way video interviewing a decade ago and still owns enterprise procurement. aperture is the modern alternative: adaptive conversations instead of scripted video prompts, λ-core scoring that admits uncertainty instead of false precision, and plan pricing without per-interview fees. hirevue wins on incumbency. aperture wins on signal and setup time.

try aperture free talk to us

pick hirevue if

you need a legacy enterprise suite with deep procurement relationships.
your team is already trained on scripted async video recordings.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews that probe, not scripted prompts candidates memorize.
you want scoring that tells you when two candidates are statistically tied.
you're tired of one-way video and candidates dropping off in the funnel.
you want to launch in days, not run a six-month enterprise rollout.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to hirevue.

feature

aperture

hirevue

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

ai assessments

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

enterprise contract

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on hirevue.

common questions.

is aperture a hirevue alternative?+

yes. hirevue is the incumbent. aperture is the modern replacement: adaptive interviews instead of scripted video, λ-core scoring instead of a black-box number, and a built-in ats.

why move off one-way video?+

scripted video prompts get gamed, have high candidate drop-off, and produce shallow signal. adaptive conversations probe based on what candidates actually say.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

ai interviewer

aperture vs heymilo

voice-first ai screening for high-volume hiring.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs chakra

structured voice interviews for technical screens.

compare

interview intelligence

aperture vs brighthire

records the interviews your team already runs.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs ribbon

voice screens that return transcripts.

compare

get started today

hire for what actually matters.

stop filtering on keywords. start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs hirevue.

try aperture free talk to us

pick hirevue if

you need a legacy enterprise suite with deep procurement relationships.
your team is already trained on scripted async video recordings.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews that probe, not scripted prompts candidates memorize.
you want scoring that tells you when two candidates are statistically tied.
you're tired of one-way video and candidates dropping off in the funnel.
you want to launch in days, not run a six-month enterprise rollout.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to hirevue.

feature

aperture

hirevue

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

ai assessments

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

enterprise contract

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on hirevue.

common questions.

is aperture a hirevue alternative?+

yes. hirevue is the incumbent. aperture is the modern replacement: adaptive interviews instead of scripted video, λ-core scoring instead of a black-box number, and a built-in ats.

why move off one-way video?+

scripted video prompts get gamed, have high candidate drop-off, and produce shallow signal. adaptive conversations probe based on what candidates actually say.

also compare