new

aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs jobma.

jobma offers cheap async video interviewing for cost-sensitive teams. aperture replaces scripted video with adaptive ai interviews, adds λ-core scoring, and ships an ats. if you want the cheapest video tool, jobma works. if you want signal that makes hiring decisions easier, aperture wins.

try aperture free talk to us

pick jobma if

budget is the only real constraint.
scripted video plus manual review is enough evaluation for your roles.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews with real scoring, not scripted videos to watch.
you want an ats built in so you don't need a second tool.
you want a free tier to start and plan pricing that doesn't punish growth.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to jobma.

feature

aperture

jobma

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on jobma.

common questions.

is aperture more expensive than jobma?+

depends on plan. aperture has a free tier and plan pricing that doesn't scale per-interview. for many teams, the total cost is similar and the signal is much better.

why move off budget video tools?+

manual video review eats recruiter hours. scored shortlists eliminate that step entirely.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

ai interviewer

aperture vs heymilo

voice-first ai screening for high-volume hiring.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs chakra

structured voice interviews for technical screens.

compare

interview intelligence

aperture vs brighthire

records the interviews your team already runs.

compare

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs hirevue

the legacy incumbent in async video.

compare

get started today

hire for what actually matters.

stop filtering on keywords. start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs jobma.

try aperture free talk to us

pick jobma if

budget is the only real constraint.
scripted video plus manual review is enough evaluation for your roles.

pick aperture if

you want adaptive interviews with real scoring, not scripted videos to watch.
you want an ats built in so you don't need a second tool.
you want a free tier to start and plan pricing that doesn't punish growth.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to jobma.

feature

aperture

jobma

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

scripted async video prompts

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

manual review

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on jobma.

common questions.

is aperture more expensive than jobma?+

depends on plan. aperture has a free tier and plan pricing that doesn't scale per-interview. for many teams, the total cost is similar and the signal is much better.

why move off budget video tools?+

manual video review eats recruiter hours. scored shortlists eliminate that step entirely.

also compare