new

aperture now ships with a built-in applicant tracking system.

now with built-in ats.

compare

aperture vs humanly.

humanly combines conversational screening with interview scheduling for mid-market teams. aperture skips the scheduling dance entirely: candidates complete an adaptive async interview on their own time and you get a scored shortlist. humanly is a chatbot plus a calendar. aperture is a full screening platform.

try aperture free talk to us

pick humanly if

scheduling live interviews is your single biggest time sink.
you're happy with chat-level screening depth.

pick aperture if

you want to skip the schedule-a-screen step entirely.
you want behavioral depth, not a chat qualifier plus calendar invite.
you want a scored, ranked shortlist, not a full calendar.
you want pipeline management built in, not another silo.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to humanly.

feature

aperture

humanly

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

chat screening + scheduling

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

qualifier logic

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on humanly.

common questions.

does aperture schedule interviews?+

aperture removes the need to schedule first-round screens. candidates complete the interview async, and scheduling only happens for final-round human conversations.

is aperture a humanly alternative?+

yes, if your goal is to cut first-round screening time. aperture replaces the chat-plus-schedule flow with an async interview and a ranked shortlist.

also compare

aperture vs other platforms.

ai interviewer

aperture vs heymilo

voice-first ai screening for high-volume hiring.

compare

ai interviewer

aperture vs chakra

structured voice interviews for technical screens.

compare

interview intelligence

aperture vs brighthire

records the interviews your team already runs.

compare

one-way video interviewing

aperture vs hirevue

the legacy incumbent in async video.

compare

get started today

hire for what actually matters.

stop filtering on keywords. start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.

try demo sign up

free to try · no credit card · instant setup

loading ...

compare

aperture vs humanly.

try aperture free talk to us

pick humanly if

scheduling live interviews is your single biggest time sink.
you're happy with chat-level screening depth.

pick aperture if

you want to skip the schedule-a-screen step entirely.
you want behavioral depth, not a chat qualifier plus calendar invite.
you want a scored, ranked shortlist, not a full calendar.
you want pipeline management built in, not another silo.

side-by-side

how aperture compares to humanly.

feature

aperture

humanly

ai behavioral interviews

15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers

chat screening + scheduling

scoring model

λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions

qualifier logic

confidence intervals on scores

yes

pool-relative ranking

yes

built-in applicant tracking system

yes

ats integrations

linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed

yes

pricing model

plan-based, never per-interview

contact sales

free tier

yes

candidate data never sold

yes

check provider policy

comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. verify details directly on humanly.

common questions.

does aperture schedule interviews?+

aperture removes the need to schedule first-round screens. candidates complete the interview async, and scheduling only happens for final-round human conversations.

is aperture a humanly alternative?+

yes, if your goal is to cut first-round screening time. aperture replaces the chat-plus-schedule flow with an async interview and a ranked shortlist.

also compare